Should the control plane adapters on controller & compute node have the same name?

asked 2015-02-10 18:16:22 -0500

I'm trying to build a proof of concept 2 physical node Juno setup: one controller/networking + one compute node following the current RDO Quickstart page. The two boxes are different hardware-wise and their network ports are named differently by CentOS 7, as they should if they named after their position on their PCI bus. It appears that packstack assumes the physical ports belonging to a control plane network should have the same name (eth1 or something), which I can't achieve with my two boxes. My attempts to rename the ports failed. Seems like CentOS 7 doesn't allow it as 6.5 does. Comments?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted

answered 2015-02-11 04:03:15 -0500

dbaxps gravatar image

updated 2015-02-11 04:08:56 -0500

I would try bonding or teaming on CentOS 7 , if it would work on OS level it should be suitable for packstack names. View "Thread bonding centos7"
It is the discussion specific for CentOS 7 ( bonding vs teaming )
Regarding general concepts :-
"Configuration with initscripts support"
Regarding "Teaming" on RHEL7 details of set up may be found here :

edit flag offensive delete link more

Get to know Ask OpenStack

Resources for moderators

Question Tools


Asked: 2015-02-10 18:16:22 -0500

Seen: 59 times

Last updated: Feb 11 '15