v2.0 in authentication or not?

asked 2014-09-14 10:31:19 -0500

wangrich
45 ●4 ●6 ●15

Hello! I'm following http://docs.openstack.org/icehouse/install-guide/install/apt/content/neutron-ml2-compute-node.html (http://docs.openstack.org/icehouse/in...) to set up OpenStack on some QEMU instances.

I'm confused by the auth_url format: some like 'http://controller:xxxx/v2.0' and some just like 'http://controller:xxx' and without v2.0. I found in Havana the 'v2.0' may be a bug in authenticating process. So I want to know what should I do?

I followed the intructions on that page exactly and I met with 'Unauthorized: Authentication required' error when Neutron tried to create port on my 'demo-net'. So the problem is critical to me.

Great thanks!

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

0

answered 2014-09-14 22:27:19 -0500

larsks
5629 ●24 ●62 ●101 http://redhat.com/

In my functioning Icehouse environment, auth_uri (NB: not auth_url) in /etc/neutron/neutron.conf does not contain the version as part of the URL. That is, I have:

auth_uri=http://127.0.0.1:5000/

On the other hand, in that same file, for configuring neutron/nova notifications, I have:

nova_admin_auth_url =http://127.0.0.1:35357/v2.0

I have not experimented with the latter to see if it will do the right thing without the /v2.0 on the end, but with these settings exactly as shown here my environment is working correctly.

edit flag offensive delete link

Get to know Ask OpenStack

Resources for moderators

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2014-09-14 10:31:19 -0500

Seen: 92 times

Last updated: Sep 14 '14

Related questions