Ask Your Question
1

Where does shared storage typically reside for guest filesystems?

asked 2013-07-18 17:57:54 -0500

aplawson gravatar image

updated 2013-07-19 16:39:03 -0500

smaffulli gravatar image

I have been deploying OpenStack with VM's leveraging local storage on the compute nodes and it works terrific. Great. But now I'm being tasked to scale to hundreds of compute nodes with shared storage (for the purposes of achieving some level of guest resiliency in the event of a host failure). My understanding of OpenStack is the architecture is typically "shared nothing" preventing data loss if a host goes down.

My question is: Where does shared storage typically reside for guest filesystems? Cinder nodes with SATA? NetApp storage appliances? What's the best performance/cost ratio? What's considered best practice? I can't justify SSD drives on multiple Cinder nodes with 40GB fabric, local storage is susceptible to host failures and SATA impacts IOPS.

Thoughts?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2013-07-19 16:48:55 -0500

fifieldt gravatar image

You may be interested in the OpenStack Operations Guide's chapter on Storage Decisions: http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-ops/content/storage_decision.html

edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Get to know Ask OpenStack

Resources for moderators

Question Tools

Stats

Asked: 2013-07-18 17:57:54 -0500

Seen: 385 times

Last updated: Jul 19 '13