Ask Your Question
0

Failover principle of Swift

asked 2012-11-15 16:58:52 -0500

gucluakkaya gravatar image

Hi,

During my test i came across following behaviour:

My environment consists of 1 proxy node and 6 storage nodes (account/container/object). I close three nodes and tried to make some gets to certain objects. I have discovered that swift proxy tried to reach the nodes which are closed thus receiving connection timeouts. I guess i did not configure my ring properly against failover. What am i missing in my configuration? You can see my configuration below:

ring configuration with partition power 18 replication 3

account-server.conf

[DEFAULT] bind_ip = 0.0.0.0 workers = 8

[pipeline:main] pipeline = account-server

[app:account-server] use = egg:swift#account

[account-replicator] run_pause=900

[account-auditor]

[account-reaper]

container-server.conf

[DEFAULT] bind_ip = 0.0.0.0 workers = 8

[pipeline:main] pipeline = container-server

[app:container-server] use = egg:swift#container

[container-replicator] run_pause=900

[container-updater]

[container-auditor]

object-server.conf

[DEFAULT] bind_ip = 0.0.0.0 workers = 8

[pipeline:main] pipeline = object-server

[app:object-server] use = egg:swift#object

[object-replicator] run_pause=900 ring_check_interval=900

[object-updater]

[object-auditor]

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete
add a comment

4 answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2012-11-15 17:04:34 -0500

gucluakkaya gravatar image

id zone ip address port name weight partitions balance meta 0 1 10.0.0.208 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 1 2 10.0.0.207 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 2 3 10.0.0.206 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 3 4 10.0.0.205 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 4 5 10.0.0.204 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 5 6 10.0.0.132 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00

0 1 10.0.0.208 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 1 2 10.0.0.207 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 2 3 10.0.0.206 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 3 4 10.0.0.205 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 4 5 10.0.0.204 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 5 6 10.0.0.132 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 

         0     1      10.0.0.208  6000      sdb1 100.00     131072    0.00 
         1     2      10.0.0.207  6000      sdb1 100.00     131072    0.00 
         2     3      10.0.0.206  6000      sdb1 100.00     131072    0.00 
         3     4      10.0.0.205  6000      sdb1 100.00     131072    0.00 
         4     5      10.0.0.204  6000      sdb1 100.00     131072    0.00 
         5     6      10.0.0.132  6000      sdb1 100.00     131072    0.00
edit flag offensive delete link more
add a comment
0

answered 2012-11-15 17:09:00 -0500

gucluakkaya gravatar image

Sorry for the previous comment accidently pressed solved button. Here is my account,container and object rings.

id zone ip address port name weight partitions balance meta 0 1 ip1 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 1 2 ip2 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 2 3 ip3 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 3 4 ip4 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 4 5 ip5 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00 5 6 ip6 6002 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00

         0 1 ip1 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         1 2 ip2 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         2 3 ip3 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         3 4 ip4 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         4 5 ip5 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         5 6 ip6 6001 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00

         0 1 ip1  6000 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         1 2 ip2 6000 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         2 3 ip3 6000 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         3 4 ip4 6000 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         4 5 ip5 6000 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
         5 6 ip6 6000 sdb1 100.00 131072 0.00
edit flag offensive delete link more
add a comment
0

answered 2012-11-15 21:57:12 -0500

clay-gerrard gravatar image

If you only stop two nodes do you still have problems?

It seems like on three replica system, with 50% of the cluster offline - there's going to be some objects that only exist on downed nodes?

-clayg

edit flag offensive delete link more
add a comment
0

answered 2012-11-16 08:28:32 -0500

gucluakkaya gravatar image

Thank you for your answer. It seems like our application inserting and retrieving containers had some problem. You are right that for 50% of cluster being offline some object cannot be retrieved and after more test i verified that failover work properly, if one node is down swift will look for another node.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

edit flag offensive delete link more
add a comment

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Get to know Ask OpenStack

Resources for moderators

Question Tools

1 follower

subscribe to rss feed

Stats

Asked: 2012-11-15 16:58:52 -0500

Seen: 101 times

Last updated: Nov 16 '12

Related questions

Installing swift stats system

how to check replicator work complete

Issue with object versioning

ISCSI target

Max Concurrent Requests

Failed at functional tests & ./.probetests

Overhead for storing each object

Performance Issue with Large Files

ETag of manifest file

How to connect the VM to the internet