First time here? Check out the FAQ!
![]() | 1 | initial version |
Yes, this is correct behavior. It gets substituted accordingly at run-time when a tenant requests an service/endpoint list.
This formatting makes it easier for services that require additional segments after the tenant ID, as well as for deployers who need to change the URL schemes a bit.
![]() | 2 | No.2 Revision |
Yes, this is correct behavior. It gets substituted accordingly at run-time when a tenant requests an a service/endpoint list.
This formatting makes it easier for services that require additional segments after the tenant ID, as well as for deployers who need to change the URL schemes a bit.