Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

Using answer field as comment due to formatting options
Please, view my sample here :- http://bderzhavets.blogspot.com/2014/11/rdo-setup-two-real-node.html
I have several concerns. Does packstack understand :-

CONFIG_NOVA_COMPUTE_PRIVIF=bond0
CONFIG_NOVA_NETWORK_PUBIF=bond0
CONFIG_NOVA_NETWORK_PRIVIF=bond0
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_IFACES=br-ex:bond0
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_TUNNEL_IF=bond0

You have

CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_MAPPINGS=physnet1:br-ex
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_IFACES=br-ex:bond0

In my sample

CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_MAPPINGS=physnet1:br-ex
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_IFACES=

and

CONFIG_NOVA_COMPUTE_PRIVIF=enp5s1
CONFIG_NOVA_NETWORK_PUBIF=enp2s0
CONFIG_NOVA_NETWORK_PRIVIF=enp5s1
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_TUNNEL_IF=enp5s1

Using answer field as comment due to formatting options
Please, view my sample here :- http://bderzhavets.blogspot.com/2014/11/rdo-setup-two-real-node.html
I have several concerns. Does packstack understand :-

CONFIG_NOVA_COMPUTE_PRIVIF=bond0
CONFIG_NOVA_NETWORK_PUBIF=bond0
CONFIG_NOVA_NETWORK_PRIVIF=bond0
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_IFACES=br-ex:bond0
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_TUNNEL_IF=bond0

You have

CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_MAPPINGS=physnet1:br-ex
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_IFACES=br-ex:bond0

In my sample

CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_MAPPINGS=physnet1:br-ex
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_BRIDGE_IFACES=

and

CONFIG_NOVA_COMPUTE_PRIVIF=enp5s1
CONFIG_NOVA_NETWORK_PUBIF=enp2s0
CONFIG_NOVA_NETWORK_PRIVIF=enp5s1
CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_TUNNEL_IF=enp5s1

In your notation how would packstack understand where is management interface and where tunnel's interface ?